Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/01/1995 03:40 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE RESOURCES COMMITTEE
March 1, 1995
3:40 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Loren Leman, Chairman
Senator Steve Frank
Senator Rick Halford
Senator Robin Taylor
Senator Georgianna Lincoln
Senator Lyman Hoffman
COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Drue Pearce, Vice Chairman
OTHER MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator John Torgerson
Representative Ivan Ivan
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
Western Alaska Community Development Quota Briefing: Karl Ohls,
Executive Director
HOUSE BILL NO. 121 (title am)
"An Act relating to salvage sales of state timber and to negotiated
sales of state timber in areas where there exists, or will exist in
two years, a high level of unemployment, underutilized
manufacturing capacity, and an underutilized cut of timber, timber
that will lose substantial economic value due to insects, disease,
or fire, or timber to be cleared for nonforest uses."
PREVIOUS ACTION
HB 121 - See Resources minutes dated 2/27/95.
WITNESS REGISTER
Karl Ohls, Executive Director
Western Alaska Community Development Program
725 Christensen Dr., Suite 5
Anchorage, AK 99501
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
Nels Anderson, Jr., Executive Director
Bristol Bay Development Corp. (BBDC)
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
Justine Gunderson, Secretary-Treasurer
Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Program
Nelson Lagoon, AK 99695
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
Agafon Krukoff Jr., Executive Director
Central Bering Sea Fishermen's Association
St. Paul, AK 99660
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
Fred Phillip, Board Member
Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
Eugene Asicksik, Acting Executive Director
Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
Ragnar Alsatrom, Board Member
Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on the CDQ Program.
George Owletuck
Marshall, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on CDQ Program.
Jack Phelps, Legislative Aide
Representative Williams
State Capitol
Juneau, AK 99801-1182
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on HB 121.
Tom Boutin
Division of Forestry
Department of Natural Resources
400 Willoughby Ave.
Juneau, AK 99801-1724
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on HB 121.
Danny Carpenter
P.O. Box 1430
Cordova, AK 99574
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
James Mykland
P.O. Box 1241
Cordova, AK 99574
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
Jillianne De La Hunt, Attorney
Trustees For Alaska
Anchorage, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
Roger Siglin
Environmental Center
169 Frog Pond Circle
Fairbanks, AK 99712
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
Larry Paquin
966 Goldmine Trail
Fairbanks, AK 99712
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
Sean McGuire
351 Cloudberry
Fairbanks, AK 99709
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
Willy Dunne
P.O. Box 15043
Fritz Creek, AK 99603
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on HB 121.
Larry Smith
Kachemak Resource Institute
1520 Lakeshore Dr.
Homer, AK 99603
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on HB 121.
Sandra Meske, President
Alaska Women In Timber
P.O. Box 1445
Ward Cove, AK 99928
POSITION STATEMENT: Supported HB 121.
Eric Muench
P.O. Box 6811
Ketchikan, AK 99901
POSITION STATEMENT: Supported HB 121.
Terry Hermach
P.O. Box 2493
Valdez, AK 99686
POSITION STATEMENT: Opposed HB 121.
Tony Reinhart, Employee and Public Relations Manager
Ketchikan Pulp
P.O. Box 6600
Ketchikan, AK 99901
POSITION STATEMENT: Supported HB 121.
ACTION NARRATIVE
TAPE 95-18, SIDE A
Number 001
CHAIRMAN LEMAN called the Senate Resources Committee meeting to
order at 3:40 p.m. and said they would first receive a briefing by
Karl Ohls of the Western Alaska Community Development Quota
Program.
KARL OHLS, Executive Director, said this program first started in
December of 1992. It involves an allocation of federal fish -
pollack in the Bering Sea. He said that Western Alaska has a very
high rate of unemployment overall, social problems, and few
opportunities for economic growth. They are located right next
door to one of the world's richest fisheries resources. This
program uses the fisheries resource to solve some of these
problems. He said part of the contract is that people will be
trained in skills for off-shore fishing where they will have an
opportunity to work on vessels and displace foreign workers.
A second advantage is that the villages get revenue from pollack
sales and invest it in fisheries development projects to build an
economy where none exists.
MR. OHLS, noting that the program is very successful, said at the
end of 1993, CDQ employment was 8% of the total economy in the
region and 18% of the total private sector economy. He suspected
that 1994 would be higher than that.
Number 110
NELS ANDERSON, JR., Executive Director, Bristol Bay Economic
Development Corporation (BBDC), said they have had 194 people on
factory trawlers since 1992 who have brought home close to half a
million dollars in wages. They have a vocational technical
training program that moves people into marine fishery jobs and
have a scholarship program which will be self supporting at the end
of 1995.
Since a lot of the limited entry permits have been leaving the
Bristol Bay region, the BBDC set up a permit brokerage so that they
could be involved directly with the movement of permits within the
region, directing those permits between Bristol Bay residents, Mr.
Anderson said. They need to set up a Bristol Bay Permit Revolving
Loan Fund to enable residents to finance the permits.
The CDQ Program is supposed to sunset December 31, 1995. They, of
course, hope it will continue. Many good things have happened;
1,600 jobs have been created since 1992. Having people work in the
winter is unprecedented in his region. As they are maturing, they
are finding ways to use the program more fully.
He noted that this program isn't a drain on the federal or state
treasury. It allocates a national resource directly to an area
that's been neglected for about 100 years.
Number 190
JUSTINE GUNDERSON, Secretary Treasurer, Aleutian Pribilof Island
Community Development Association, said you can actually see the
development in her communities, some of which she highlighted -
harbor development, a gear storage warehouse, a comprehensive
training, employment, and education program, and building some off-
shore boats. She said one of the most important things is that the
money they receive is coming from the private sector, not
government, and they are seeing it in their communities.
AGAFON KRUKOFF JR., Executive Director, Central Bering Sea
Fishermen's Association, said they finished the boat harbor on St.
Paul using CDQ funds matched by state funds. They are also using
the money for training in trade schools that are fisheries related.
CDQ funds have enabled a lot of employment to open up, he said.
This program is the tool that will make the rural Alaska people,
especially in the coastal communities, be a key part of the
industry that is out there.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked him to comment on how positive the CDQ is to
all of Western Alaska communities.
MR. KRUKOFF replied that most rural Alaskan communities have
suffered because of the lack of jobs and the social impacts that
result - like alcohol and drug abuse. The CDQ is enabling them to
bring jobs to their people which indirectly helps the other social
problems.
Number 354
FRED PHILLIPS, Board Member, Coastal Villages Fishing Cooperative,
summarized some of their major programs which are in the areas of
creating employment opportunities through developing local
fisheries infrastructures and participation in the fisheries. They
also have scholarship programs in fishery related areas.
EUGENE ASICKSIK, Active Executive Director, Norton Sound Economic
Development Corporation, said they also have an education-
employment training program and a loan program. They have targeted
getting fishermen back into the "fishing stream" through developing
herring markets.
Number 434
SENATOR LINCOLN asked him to comment on the reduction of bycatch
with the CDQ Program. MR. ASICKSIK said one of their agreements
with one fish company is that if they feel the company is catching
too much bycatch of salmon (which the village members depend on),
they will move their fishing operation.
SENATOR TAYLOR commented that he had not heard any opposition to
the reauthorization of this program. MR. ASICKSIK said he hadn't
heard of any criticism openly.
RAGNAR ALSTROM, Board Member, Yukon Delta Fisheries Development
Association, said that the Yukon Delta has a very high unemployment
rate. With their pollack royalty they pursue aggressively a job
training and employment program on factory trawlers which has been
very successful. The heart of their program, however, is to bring
employment to the people who live on the Delta. They have invested
in a small boat fleet which has brought a good amount of wages for
its workers.
REPRESENTATIVE IVAN said another positive impact the CDQ Program
had is that the villages within the group sit down and develop
their business plans together. He said it affects non-CDQ
villages, as well, by providing jobs.
Number 542
SENATOR HOFFMAN said that he was aware of a number of communities
that would like to participate in the CDQ Program now and asked if
this could be addressed at reauthorization. MR. OHLS replied that
the criteria that the State and the North Pacific Council decided
on were those communities that were within 50 miles of the Bering
Sea coast. He knows of some communities that have extended their
programs to other communities that are farther away, however. It
would be up to the Council to change that requirement. He said the
reauthorization probably would extend the program as it exists
today.
MR. OHLS concluded that each group has taken a slightly different
strategy on economic growth in Western Alaska which he thought was
one of the positive aspects of the program. Each group is under
pressure to perform. The state made it very clear that those who
weren't successful would lose their quota and it would be given to
those who were successful.
He said the state and legislature have supported this program since
it started.
TAPE 95-18, SIDE B
Number 001
SENATOR LEMAN said that he has been impressed with the results from
the CDQ Program.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked if there was anything the legislature could
do to make this program even more successful. MR. OHLS replied
that so far they have been very happy with the state's response and
would like their continuing support.
GEORGE OWLETUCK, Marshall resident, said the upper villages on the
Yukon River are being left out of the CDQ Program. Salmon fishing
has not been very good lately and they would like the opportunity
to have a CDQ Program.
SENATOR TAYLOR pointed out that these federally dictated programs
lack local input to the extent that some people get left out.
SRES 3/1/95
HB 121 SALVAGE TIMBER SALES
SENATOR LEMAN announced HB 121 to be up for consideration.
JACK PHELPS, Legislative Aide to Representative Williams, said the
intent of HB 121 and the substance of the bill is to provide
another management tool to the Division of Forestry to deal with
salvage timber. It doesn't mandate any action on the part of the
Department. It simply expands the range of options available to
DNR so they can respond to forest health situations. Salvage sales
would still be subject to forest land use plans just like any other
sale.
What this bill does mean, he said, is that in salvage situations
timber can be available within four to six months instead of two to
three years, but there would still be ample opportunity for public
involvement. The Forest Land Use Plan required under these
provisions would have to support the best interest finding that is
required by the bill.
Habitat protection is no more at risk with salvage sales than it is
with any other sale of State timber under current law.
TOM BOUTIN, Director, Division of Forestry, said they had a
proposed amendment. It would make two changes. The first is in
Section 1 (a), line 10 where they insert "dead or dying" before
"timber" and they delete "stands". He said they still have the
same ability to have salvage sales without them having been in the
five-year plan for the two-prior years which he thought was the
sole intent in Section 1(a).
He suggested deleting Section 1(b), because the Division of
Forestry very rarely does negotiated sales. He said they do one or
two a year in McGrath where there is no competitive interest
whatsoever. Occasionally they do agriculture parcels in Delta by
negotiated sale for junk timber that someone just wants to get rid
of, and no one has an interest in, but the party that wants to
clear the timber. There is not a disadvantage to having a
competitive sale. He said this neutralized some opposition to the
bill.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked him why he searched out the opposition. MR.
BOUTIN replied that it was worth trying to really find out what the
opposition is concerned with and seeing if it can be accommodated.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked him if the administration would support the
bill without the changes. MR. BOUTIN said he understood that the
Administration would not support the bill without the changes.
Number 401
SENATOR TAYLOR said he was concerned with inserting "dead or dying"
because they are talking about an infestation of epidemic
proportions upon a large drainage. He was surprised that he would
use that kind of language when the treatment they are trying to
accomplish is the eradication of that epidemic. MR. BOUTIN replied
that if this bill was giving them the ability to sell the timber at
all, he would share his concern, but all section 1(a) does is give
them the ability to exempt the Division from having the sale in the
five-year plan for the two-prior years. They are really trying to
address situations where there is a certain urgency. People are
concerned that they will use that urgency in some other way.
SENATOR TAYLOR noted that Alaska has a forest base that is 25%
larger in volume than all the forested lands in Alberta, Canada.
Alberta, today, has 32,000 people directly employed in a timber
industry base on a sustained yield basis using exactly the same
boreal forest that we have in Alaska. He said that the Division of
Forestry does not deal with large timber sales and he wanted to
know what they were going to do to treat over a billion board feet
of desecrated timber that's been left to rot by several
administrations and their colleagues who did everything to make
certain that that timber wasn't harvested.
SENATOR TAYLOR said he has not offered amendments to this bill,
because he wanted to give the department the greatest opportunity
to do negotiated sales, to take care of treatment of epidemics that
have some affect.
MR. BOUTIN reiterated that they have done a good job of
neutralizing opposition, and where they haven't neutralized it,
they have gone to court and won. The best place to do it is before
you get to court and he thought this bill with the suggested
changes would further that goal.
Number 334
SENATOR LEMAN asked him to comment on his fiscal note. MR. BOUTIN
said it gives a number of options depending on the interpretation.
He said if this bill contemplates an increase in timber
productivity, then there's a proportional increase in cost, etc.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked him which fiscal note he assumed his
Department would go with. MR. BOUTIN said he supposed the sponsors
of the bill did not contemplate increasing the amount of timber
volume or substituting salvage sales and had assumed number one,
but he didn't really know what the case was and laid out some
options.
Number 283
DANNY CARPENTER, 15-year resident of Alaska, said the demise of
salmon runs on the West Coast is very real and it is directly
related to development and resource extraction. He believes in
development, but not with inconsequential effects on other
profitable industries. HB 121 is written as an employment bill for
a small group of people and, secondly, to provide material for saw
and chip mills at, undoubtedly, a discount rate; and, lastly, a
solution to the spruce bark beetle epidemic. He said if you're
serious about containing the epidemic, transporting infested timber
to healthy areas or chipping trees and distributing beetles and
larvae in a healthy area is not a great idea. He also could not see
how they could tell two years in advance which timber might be
affected. He suggested researching whether current forestry
procedures have been put into affect and if not, why not.
He concluded saying that the salvage sales would directly impact
the health and habitat of his area to provide a few jobs for some
loggers in Senator Taylor's area.
Number 230
JAMES MYKLAND, Cordova resident, said he spent the first 20 years
of his life in Washington State and the last 24 years in the Prince
William Sound area as a commercial fisherman. MR. MYKLAND said he
opposed HB 121 as written. Large volume timber sales should be
offered competitively and with public notice. The Commissioner of
Natural Resources in this bill is given unchecked power. He noted
that no reforestation is required within the salvage areas in HB
121.
MR. MYKLAND said that watershed protection should be the number one
priority of the DNR, not timber sales or resource development. In
Washington he saw large scale loss of fish and wildlife habitat.
In his opinion, that is one of the main reasons that the resources
on the West Coast States have been decimated. They are almost non-
existent. The value of our forests is not just in the standing
trees.
SENATOR TAYLOR said he just checked with the State Forester and
reforestation would be required on these sales and then commented
that, on the average in Alaska, forest fires burn 15,000 acres a
year in just the Tanana Valley. There is no one responsible for
reforesting it. It's just charred and lays there. There are 1,000
acres a year harvested which is all reforested as part of the
contract. He commented that it sounded like they would probably be
happier if the billion board feet and who knows how many hundred
thousand acres of dead and dying trees would burn up.
JUILLIANNE DE LA HUNT, Trustees for Alaska, said she was testifying
on behalf of Kris Balliet who was concerned that the public process
was being circumvented in this bill. She asked the Committee to
consider that leading experts in the field do not consider the
spruce bark beetle an epidemic, but part of a natural forest
process. Cutting in salvage sales involves cutting a large number
of green trees. It's not a treatment for bark beetles, even if it
were an infestation. The existing Forest Practices Act has
provisions that would allow DNR to do exactly what it appears this
Committee is concerned with.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked her who pays her wages. MS. DE LA HUNT said
Trustees For Alaska is funded from many sources including many
individual Alaskans.
Number 89
ROGER SIGLIN, Environmental Center, said it was clear that they
need to get the legislature out of the timber managing business.
He thought that most of the environmental community supports
logging, but not at the expense of other values. He urged them to
make sure there was a fair process established that would
adequately represent everyone's values and interests.
LARRY PAQUIN, Fairbanks resident, opposed HB 121, because it
attempts to circumvent existing forest management laws - The Forest
Practices Act and the five-year harvest schedules. This bill makes
a mockery of forest management, since the Commissioner can waive
the two-year public notice for the 500,000 board feet limit if he
suspects state timber is being underutilized, or if a high level of
unemployment exists.
TAPE 95-19, SIDE A
MR. PAQUIN said this legislation would set a bad precedent for
forest management in the future. He was concerned that forests be
managed responsibly and for sustained yield management for future
generations. This is all that those people who oppose HB 121 are
asking for, he commented.
SEAN MCGUIRE, Fairbanks resident, said that Jan Dahl wants the
Committee to consider her request for having fiscal notes for all
three of the resource agencies - ADF&G, DEC, and DNR.
He challenged the idea of using the term "waste." He said the
trees do not go to waste, they fall down and replenish the soil.
It is even crucial to the health of the soil.
He did not like the idea that one person in DNR could make a
decision to sign a 25-year contract. He thought it was a loop hole
and that someone would someday use it.
MR. MCQUIRE said it seems that the Republicans are basically
supporting logging interests that generally represent a tiny
fraction of Alaskans. The perception is beginning to be that the
Republicans are doing this to the detriment of most Alaskans.
WILLY DUNNE, Fritz Creek resident, noted that four people who could
have testified on Monday could not make it back today. He said he
is a hunter and fisherman and he has a strong interest in the use
of our forest resources. He is not opposed to timber harvest. He
noted this bill is opposed by commercial fishermen, loggers, timber
operators, log home builders, and conservation groups around the
state.
Section 1 of this bill does not increase timber supply so much as
just speeding up the process of disposing of timber. Section 2
could generate long term timber supply under negotiated contracts,
but a 25-year negotiated contract would not exactly be a salvage
sale. He didn't know of anyone in DNR who would say that logging
improves forest health problems. In fact, many biologists and
forest ecologists feel that insects and fire are a natural part of
a forest ecosystem.
He asked them to consider amendments to this bill to make it more
palatable to the public. If the true intent of the bill is
salvage, the perception is that it would do something more than
that.
Number 102
LARRY SMITH, Kachemak Resource Institute, said they try to
interface the economy with ecology, because they don't operate well
without each other.
MR. SMITH said he is also a home builder and he thought the best
wood to use for this purpose was five-year old standing dead wood
that has had time to reach ambient moisture levels. 30-year old
standing dead wood is even better, he said.
Piecemeal revisions to the Forest Practices Act coming through the
legislature are exactly that, he said, and proposed establishing a
special committee on forest resources, perhaps supported by a
working group, to resolve the issues.
He said that a total review was promised when the Title 38 and 41
revisions in the Forest Practices Act were made law by the 1990
legislature. Back then he sponsored the beetle control language,
including the amendments making salvage a requirement.
There needs to be a thorough fiscal review, because he didn't think
DNR and ADF&G have the resources to properly deal with the issues.
The last 12 salvage sales are cases in point. He emphasized if
they are going to remove the time for audit in the five-year
schedules for collecting extra local knowledge about impact on
resources and for the agencies to do the work the Forest Practices
Act requires, they would have to put significant up-front money
into this legislation so the same work can be done on an
accelerated basis.
He said they would be trashing wetlands, fish resources, and noted
that the Corps of Engineers are exempted from permitting nationally
for logging work in wetlands which caused a big problem in the head
waters of the Ninilchik River where, he explained, a new anadromous
fish stream was discovered.
Number 234
SANDRA MESKE, Alaska Women In Timber, supported HB 121. She said
they are in favor of multiple use management of our state lands.
She stated that ignoring the problems caused by the extensive
spruce bark beetle infestation on state lands does not provide
multiple use or proper management of our natural resources.
Recreationalists, wildlife, local economies, and resource
industries all suffer under mismanagement. HB 121 offers a
solution to this management crisis.
ERIC MUENCH, Ketchikan, supported HB 121. He said it gives DNR the
necessary flexibility to deal with insect outbreaks and control the
loss of value. In over 30 years in Alaska, he has seen several
instances where the delay of salvage for as little as two years has
either lowered the revenues and volume recovery of a sale or made
it necessary to "sweeten the pot" of a sale by including green
timber at a salvage price. He said deterioration of the wood
starts as soon as the tree dies, and that dead trees are more of a
fire hazard than live ones.
TERRY HERMACH, Valdez, said he was a 20-year resident of Alaska and
spent 20 years in Oregon before that. He thought Senator Taylor's
vision of Alaska is very similar to what he left behind there which
wasn't a very pretty sight, he said. Every time it rained the
streams turn chocolate brown and the salmon runs are zero. He very
much opposed HB 121 as a very short-sighted bill.
He accused DNR of showing gross negligence in management of state
lands in the past and asked how they could expect them to do better
in the future. He said that right now DNR has slated a timber sale
for the city limits of Valdez even though the vast majority of the
people are opposed to it.
The other example was Oil Lease Sale 79 on the Copper River Flats
which shows a total disregard for the livelihood of other
industries.
TROY REINHART, Employee Relations and Public Affairs Manager for
Ketchikan Pulp, supported HB 121. To put this in perspective, he
said, last year on the Tongass National Forest, where there is
truly a large scale forest products industry, 600,000 trees were
harvested. The Society of American Forestry estimates that this
year on the Kenai Peninsula 20 million trees died. This is a
tremendous forest health problem; this isn't a question of the
economy; it's just the right thing to do, he said, adding that he
is a professional forester.
Ketchikan Pulp Co. and the Alaska Forest Association support this
bill. Contrary to what the state forester said, the environmental
groups that he deals with do not want to cut one tree whether it's
dead or alive.
Number 390
SENATOR TAYLOR offered the amendment proposed by DNR, but he
objected for purposes of discussion.
SENATOR LINCOLN said one of the questions raised in Jan Dahl's memo
was regarding fiscal notes. MR. BOUTIN said the fiscal note
"event" had come about last night and he has not contacted the
other agencies today. SENATOR LINCOLN asked if ADF&G and DEC had
testified on this issue.
MR. PHELPS said they had numerous conversations with ADF&G about
this bill and their concerns were whether habitat was adequately
protected and that centered around the question of whether Forest
Land Use Plans would continue in effect even if there were some
salvage sale that took place. Working with the forester, they were
able to assure ADF&G that that was the case. Because of those
assurances, the department has put forward neither a position paper
nor a fiscal note. The fiscal note from DNR, until very recently,
was $0, he explained, because they didn't see that it required them
to do anything new.
SENATOR LINCOLN moved to adopt DNR amendment #2. SENATOR TAYLOR
objected.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked if the sponsor objected to using the
terminology "dead and dying."
REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAMS explained that the reason he disliked using
"dead and dying" is that there are areas in the forest where there
are dead trees and there might be one or two live trees the insects
haven't gotten to, yet. In order to "manage" a timber stand, it
would be easier to cut the live trees also, because you have to
build a road through it to get to some of the dead and dying trees.
MR. PHELPS added that it doesn't make sense to confine all your
harvest to the trees that are actually dead or dying and you open
serious litigation possibilities, if under the law, you could only
log dead or dying trees in the process of a timber sale.
SENATOR FRANK said he thought they needed a letter of intent to the
Department of Natural Resources.
MR. BOUTIN said a letter of intent along the lines of the first
part of amendment #2 would go a long way to appease the people who
are concerned they would abuse the language of "timber stands."
SENATOR FRANK proposed dividing the amendment into a letter of
intent and an amendment regarding the negotiated sale.
SENATOR LEMAN asked if anyone objected to dividing the amendment.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked the sponsor if he agreed to work with the
department on a letter of intent. REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAMS said he
did agree. SENATOR LINCOLN, then, withdrew amendment #2.
Number 522
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to adopt amendment #1. There were no
objections and the sponsor said he accepted it and it was so
ordered.
SENATOR FRANK moved to asked DNR to work with Representative
Williams in writing a letter of intent. There were no objections
and it was so ordered.
SENATOR TAYLOR said he also wanted to adopt the committee fiscal
note of March 1, 1995 (assumption #1 in a previously received
fiscal note from DNR). There were no objections and it was so
ordered.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to pass SCSHB 121 from committee with
individual recommendations. He added that he thought it was
necessary to adequately fund the department if they are going to do
any volume of sales. There were no objections and it was so
ordered.
SENATOR LEMAN adjourned the meeting at 5:55 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|